Mike Nadel is an idiot
So last week Mike Nadel went off on Erin Andrews choice of dress at a recent game she covered, starting off his article with this:
Erin Andrews, the ESPN “it” babe who clearly isn’t afraid to flaunt it, sauntered around the visiting clubhouse, flitting from one Cubs player to another. Her skimpy outfit — designed to accentuate her, um, positives — had players leering at her. Some made lewd comments under their breath. Others giggled like 12-year-olds.
After reading this, I thought Erin Andrews was scantly clad at the game. However, after seeing a photo of her wardrobe, I knew Nadel was wasting paper and ink. This is what she wore 
I don’t think anyone should be offended by her wardrobe. Maybe on a hot steamy evening, she didn’t want to wear a sweater and dress pants. After all, Erin Andrews fills 2 holes in 1 for ESPN. She provides the eye candy for ESPN’s biggest audience, young males such as myself, and she is an excellent reporter who knows her stuff. Her boss agrees, saying,
“Erin is a tremendous reporter. She’s a prepared, hard-working journalist who is well-respected and asks excellent questions,” ESPN news executive Norby Williamson said in a statement. “We’re proud to have her as an important part of our coverage team. Beyond that, we feel it’s unnecessary to even respond to any of the specifics outlined (by Nadel).”
Further, Nadel needs to get his facts straight too, regarding Andrews’ actions:
Still, the Brewers’ claims of being unaffected by this series’ results were as unbelievable as Erin Andrews’ work clothes. “Good for you, Rammie,” Andrews said three hours before the game, bending forward to shake Aramis Ramirez’s hand. “Good for you.”
Ramirez, who had three doubles in the Cubs’ 7-1 victory the previous night, sheepishly accepted Andrews’ congratulations. She didn’t ask him any questions because he was sitting on the players-only sofa; she seemingly just wanted to show “Rammie” her support. Weird.
Moments later, the blonde reporter was chatting with Alfonso Soriano. At one point, she placed her hand suggestively on Soriano’s left bicep.
“Hey, hey, hey! Look at this!” [Cubs Manager Lou] Piniella said, loudly and excitedly. “Are you doing a baseball game today or a modeling assignment?”
This is what Andrews said to that:
*On Lou Piniella’s comment: “That did happen. But my stance is that people can say what they want. Lou Piniella looks at me like a daughter. If it was the first time I had met him, that would be one thing.”
*On Ramirez, Andrews said she walked over to the players-only area where Ramirez was sitting because pitcher Ryan Dempster called her over to show her pictures of his son from the All-Star game. She said she was not aware his nickname was “Rammie” and said she did not call him that.
*On Soriano, Andrews said she touched his hand, not his bicep, and was trying to gauge where the bone was that he broke earlier this year.
And apparently, Nadel didn’t even talk to her about the article, as Andrews said
“I think my overall reaction is that it’s really sad that in 2008 … I have people watching every single move I make. When there’s a big game between the Cubs and Brewers going on, it’s sad that that’s what their focus is on. … And the last thing I had heard is that when you want to do a story on someone, you contact them.”
Way to bring the heat, Erin. The real unprofessional person here is Mike Nadel. I seem to have forgotten that this blog is about blasting the truth and asking the hard questions, so here I go: First off, why didn’t Nadel talk with Erin before writing the article. Second, why was Erin Andrews wardrobe the focus of the article to begin with? Third, why did Nadel write things that were not true, such as suggestively touching Soriano bicep and congratulating Ramirez? Someone ought to blast Mike Nadel and his unprofessional ways